To the Editor,
I honestly do not understand William Lee’s reasoning about
his and Elizabeth Warren’s ethnic heritage (“Integrity Really Does Matter,”
Op/Ed Wednesday, September 26, 2012). Like Lee, Elizabeth Warren has excellent
reasons for thinking that she has Native American ancestry, and when asked her
ethnicity she proudly and honestly checked the “Native American” box. There is
no evidence that she did this in the expectation of special treatment, and
there is no evidence that she received any such treatment on account of it. She
has said she did not, and with what documentary evidence do Lee, or Scott
Brown, challenge her word? More importantly, on what basis does Lee describe
his own reticence as integrity, and Warren’s frankness as dishonesty?
Far more Americans have Native American ancestry than know
about it, just as far more of us have African-Americans in our lineage than we
are ready to acknowledge. This is particularly so in the state of Oklahoma,
where for generations many “white” families have massaged the illusion of their
racial purity for fear of racist stigma, or out of their own racial animus. Formal
records of intermarriage are scarce, for the obvious reason that nobody wanted
to admit to it. Given that history, which our nation has far from completely
outgrown, the courageous and honest thing to do is to own up to one’s native
roots, as Warren has.
2 comments:
What is William Lee's point? Is he saying that because he doesn't actually look Native American (something about a 'ruddy complexion') and can only claim Native American blood by way of his (dirt poor) family's oral history that he doesn't feel like claiming Indian ancestry? Ok. But, he doesn’t feel that Elizabeth Warren should claim Indian ancestry either, and since she does (to no supposed advantage), he's not voting for her. Seriously?
That does seem to be his position, strange though it seems.
Post a Comment