Friday, September 17, 2010

Socrates on Music

Even at the literal level of the argument in Republic II and III, Socrates’ critique of music and the poets acknowledges just how powerful these media are in human life: there would be no need to edit them for style and content if they were merely diverting, rather than formative. He not only observes the depth at which music touches our consciousness (“…rhythm and harmony most of all insinuate themselves into the inmost part of the psyche and most vigorously lay hold of it in bringing grace with them…” 401D), which we now understand to involve neural integration unmatched by other cognitive processes (See Leviton, This is Your Brain on Music); he is clearly aware of just how plastic human nature is as a whole. Socrates here expresses this insight negatively, in terms of risk and corruptibility, but the flip side is our potent educability. He assumes neither that humans are naturally good nor that they are bad; he observes, rather, that we are capable of learning.

4 comments:

David K. Braden-Johnson said...

How would you distinguish Plato's from Socrates' view of music (if at all)?

Matt Silliman said...

I don't know. What do you take to be Plato's view? Nothing prevents an argument by Socrates or any other character from representing Plato's actual (at least tentative) position in any given case, but we can't assume that Socrates is Plato's "mouthpiece" in general, for various reasons.

David K. Braden-Johnson said...

I number among those who tend naively to equate Socrates' view with Plato's. I understand my error, but don't know enough about Plato to know how to correct for it.

Matt Silliman said...

Check out Kenneth M. Sayer's 1996 book Plato's Literary Garden, the introduction and first chapter of which give some good suggestions about how and why to read Plato's dialogues on multiple levels.